personally i went the motovert over the honda as i didnt have much disposable income. My bike cost me $600 off a mate its a motovert 2006 pro and i put it against my cousins crf50 with $10,000 + spent on it and the only difference is the brand name parts and that its a honda theres really not a 10k difference in the bike as far as performance. And with the verts they come with nice suspension and forks so you can jump them with ease and without running the risk of breaking it....... if your mechanically minded you will have no problem with a motovert but if u have no idea about basic mechanics and the upkeep of a motorcycle you will have a gunka of a bike....
So a motovert is better value unless ur gonna spend alot on a crf .
Sidney you have no idea about anything wanka he wanted a performance bike , without spending too much cash .